← Back to Blog

What Automated Accessibility Tools Can — and Can’t — Detect

Anonymous
January 1, 1970

Most accessibility tools promise clarity.


What they actually provide is partial visibility — and that’s not a failure. It’s reality.


Automated accessibility testing typically detects around 30–40% of WCAG issues. When people hear that number, the reaction is often disappointment: “That’s all?” But accessibility problems aren’t purely technical, and expecting automation to catch everything misunderstands the problem.


What automated tools are good at


Automation excels at identifying objective, testable failures, such as:

  • Missing form labels
  • Insufficient color contrast
  • Missing alt attributes
  • Incorrect ARIA roles
  • Obvious keyboard traps


These are real issues. They block users. And catching them automatically saves teams hundreds of hours.


Automation also provides consistency. It doesn’t forget to test a page. It doesn’t get tired. It can scan hundreds or thousands of URLs in minutes. That alone makes it indispensable.


Where automation stops helping


What automation can’t do is judge quality or intent.


A tool can tell you that an image has alt text.

It cannot tell you whether that alt text is meaningful.


A tool can confirm that focus moves via keyboard.

It cannot tell you whether the focus order makes sense to a human being.


A tool can flag headings.

It cannot tell you whether the content hierarchy is logical.


These are not edge cases. They are the majority of real-world accessibility problems.


The common misuse of accessibility tools


The biggest mistake teams make is treating automated tools as final arbiters of accessibility. A clean scan becomes a certificate. The certificate becomes reassurance. And accessibility quietly degrades again the moment content changes.


Automation doesn’t fail here — process does.


The right way to use automation


Automated testing is not a verdict.

It’s an early warning system.


Used correctly, it:

  • Catches regressions early
  • Highlights high-risk areas
  • Reduces the scope of manual reviews
  • Creates a baseline you can improve over time


Accessibility improves when automation is paired with:

  • Human judgment
  • Ongoing monitoring
  • Clear ownership


Automation doesn’t replace thinking.

It gives you a place to start — and that’s valuable.